Read:

Cohen & Rosenzweig, Digital History, Ch. 3

Howard Besser, “The Past, Present, and Future of Digital Libraries,” and Marilyn Deegan and Simon Tanner, “Conversion of Primary Sources, in Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, John Unsworth, Companion to Digital Humanities (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004).

Michael Jon Jensen, “Evolution, Intelligent Design, Climate Change, and the Scholarly Ecosystem,” March 2006.

Richard Cox, “Machines in the archives: Technology and the cing transformation of archival reference” First Monday [Online], 12: 11 (28 October 2007)

Libraryman, Dear Facebook and Google: I love libraries more.

Cat Kong Vs. Googzilla, Burritt Library Newsletter Spring 2008

Case Studies:

Finding Aids Next Generation (FANG) Project: a finding aid that incorporates Web 2.0 technologies

National Academies Press Reference Finder

NUCMC: National Union Catalog of Manuscript Collections

National Archives

Studio: Digital Images

Doctored images. One serious concern with digitization is the fear that it may be more difficult to detect when sources have been altered. In Digital History, Cohen and Rosenzweig give the example of George E. Mahlberg’s “In-A-Gadda-Da-Oswald” (1996). For more examples, look through the collection of “Pictures that Lie” on CNET News. First of all, think about these modified sources as a traditional historian. Is there internal evidence that tells you that they are faked? (In the case of the Mahlberg picture, I’m thinking of the relative dates of men’s headwear, Roland D20 synthesizers and the Dead Kennedys). Now read about the research of Hany Farid at Dartmouth:

Do you think that digital manipulation is going to be a serious problem for digital historians or not? Try to write a balanced assessment in your blog.

One Response to “Week 8: Changing Libraries”

  1. stongerac Says:

    Digital manipulation is a serious concern for all digital historians as we are not trained to uncover these fakes. Our continued vigilance in backing up photos with historical text from investigation and research is our main way of proving our publications. Uncovering fakes will take much effort but we are already inundated with fakes in the tabloid world that we need to be suspicious of. Any photograph that is not backed up with source evidence and facts should be taken as a fake until proven with back up documentation and facts. I see this as a job for historians in the future, to uncover photo fakes for companies and governments who need the truth to manage their endeavors.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.